What’s Weird About Rusty Blackbirds

What’s Weird About Rusty Blackbirds

Rusty Blackbird, Cleveland, Ohio, 10/9/2011. Photo by Laura Gooch (CC-by-nc-sa).

The voice of Rusty Blackbird isn’t particularly well known.  Perhaps because the species is uncommon and its breeding grounds rather remote, it’s never been the subject of a formal bioacoustic study.  But Rusty Blackbirds sing quite a bit — both males and females sing, in fact.  They sing on the breeding grounds, on migration in fall and spring, and pretty much all winter long.  The winter flocks I encountered in the swamps of Arkansas could be heard for half a mile.

Several authors have described Rusty Blackbirds as having two types of songs — one more creaking, one more gurgling — and this would make sense given that the closely related Brewer’s Blackbird has also been reported to have two different songs of more or less the same types.  As I went through online recordings of Rusty Blackbirds, however, I came to the conclusion that I was hearing three different types of songs from the species, not two.  Or is that two types of song and a very song-like call?

Three things Rusty Blackbirds say

The gurgle-creak seems like a good candidate for a typical “song.”  It starts with a complex jumble of rapid notes and ends with a high monotone whistle with a metallic quality, like the creak of a rusty hinge:

Another song-like sound is the gurgle.  It’s like the first part of the gurgle-creak, but at least twice as long.

Then there’s the creak.  It’s like the gurgle-creak, but starts with only 1-2 quick notes, usually including a noisy “chuck” note much like the species’ contact call.  On the spectrogram below, two creaks follow a gurgle-creak:

It’s fairly clear that these three song-like sounds are associated with different behaviors.  The gurgle-creaks seem typical of songs — they’re practiced throughout the winter, getting gradually more stereotyped; they’re heard from spring migrants, who seem to have mastered them by the time they head north; and they’re delivered in long bouts on the breeding grounds, where they apparently function in territorial defense and mate attraction.

The gurgles, unlike the gurgle-creaks, are rarely heard on the breeding grounds.  Instead, they mostly seem to be given by birds immediately prior to or during spring migration.  The only recording I know of from the breeding grounds is from early in the season — 4 June in northwest Alaska.  Perhaps they function primarily in pair establishment, and are used for just a few days after arrival on breeding territories.

Then there are the creaks, which seem to occupy an odd territory in between traditional “calls” and “songs.”  Like traditional “songs,” they appear to be learned rather than innate — birds spend the winter practicing them, and the finished springtime performances vary greatly from one male to the next.  Furthermore, they’re often deployed along with the gurgle-creaks by territorial birds on the breeding grounds, in response to playback of a rival’s song.  That pretty well matches the classic definition of “song.”

But when else do we hear creaks?  When Rusty Blackbirds mob Common Ravens.  And in response to a tape of Northern Goshawk.  And when a human threatens a nest.  Most birds do not give songs, or anything like a song, in these situations.  Instead we’d expect to hear alarm calls — typically harsh, noisy, simple sounds that carry far and don’t change from one bird to the next.  Rusty Blackbirds have such calls — sharp chucks, long churrs, rattling chatters, and the like.  As one would expect, they readily chuck and churr and chatter at ravens and goshawks and people, but they also give song-like creaks.  What’s up with that?

Longtime readers of this blog will know that I don’t put much stock in the traditional “song/call” distinction, and here’s one more example of why not — a peculiar sound that straddles the traditional boundary in both form and function.  Rusty Blackbird has attracted a fair amount of research attention in recent years due to evidence that its populations may be in steep decline.  But I’m unaware that anyone has attempted to investigate its vocal communication.  Here’s hoping someone will take it on — I think this bird deserves it.

7 thoughts on “What’s Weird About Rusty Blackbirds

  1. Thank you very much for this. The solo song I have recorded in NE Ohio seems to be the “creak.” I know they have a variety of songs/calls, but they just aren’t around long enough – and aren’t usually accessible enough – to really learn the possibilities. This is very helpful.

  2. Great post Nathan. In three springs of research in northern Maine, I never heard the gurgle, only gurgle-creaks and chuck notes. It seems to me that what you call a “creak”, is actually a gurgle-creak with a very short gurgle – the length of the gurgle before the creek can vary considerably, even within individuals.

  3. Thanks for your insights, Luke. The gurgle-creak and the creak are certainly similar, and both are apparently used in song-like contexts. And there is certainly much variation between individuals (and, in winter and spring, within individuals). But the creaks and gurgle-creaks of individual breeding birds seem pretty well stereotyped, at least according to the recordings I’ve got access to, and that means that a creak isn’t just a truncated gurgle-creak — at the very least it’s a distinct songtype. Since it’s given in situations when the gurgle-creak apparently isn’t (such as alarm / mobbing / threat contexts), it’s probably best considered a distinct vocalization altogether.

  4. Nice piece. A few other examples… I recorded and filmed Rusty’s in the same spot as Gerrit, (Pilgrim hot springs near Nome, AK) in 2009. The Gurgle was a commonly heard vocalization from males perched on prominent emergent vegetation. This was an early breeding season encounter, very soon after appreciable snow-melt and I bet it was not too long after the birds arrived on the breeding grounds.
    Heres the audio recording: http://macaulaylibrary.org/audio/141068
    and a video of another male in the same vicinity: http://macaulaylibrary.org/video/467689

  5. Thanks, Benjamin! Good to know there are other examples, and that information about the season is helpful.

  6. I have one recording I thought interesting of a Rusty Blackbird (taken on Feb 15, 2009 in central New Jersey). The bird started with ‘chuck’ sounds which accellerated in pace. Here’s a sense of the increasing tempo in seconds between chucks:

    4.9
    3.0
    2.8
    4.9
    1.6
    1.4
    1.6
    1.0
    1.4
    0.9
    0.9
    1.0
    0.7
    0.6
    1.0
    Gurgle-creak

    Soon after that first ‘gurgle-creak’, if more than one ‘chuck’ was delivered in a row, they were always less than half a second apart, sounding as if “doubled.” The appearance of gurgles and gurgle-creaks increased between the chucks.

    From here to end of the file, I’ll lump gurgles/gurgle-creaks as “Gurgle”; this is an approximate ratio between Gurgles and Chucks in groups of 10 sounds (5 left over bringing up the rear). One interesting item is when the longer string of Gurgles were uttered, many “chuck” calls during this time were noticeably less strident than those at the start:

    Gurgles vs. Chucks
    3 – 7
    5 – 5
    5 – 5
    6 – 4
    4 – 6
    6 – 4 (start hearing ‘lower’ chucks)
    7 – 3 (all 3 chucks ‘lower’)
    4 – 6 (most chucks ‘lower’)
    5 – 5 (most chucks ‘higher’)
    4 – 6 (all chucks ‘higher’)
    4 – 6 (high/low even)
    5 – 5 (high/low even)
    4 – 6 (high/low even)
    4 – 1

    Looks like I’ve lost the audio file containing the last part of his performance, but it “wound down” in a similar manner … the numbers of chucks increased until there were few gurgles or gurgle-creaks. Finally, only chucks were delivered, and took longer between each utterance. Then the bird flew away.

Comments are closed.

Comments are closed.