Song of Smudgy

"Smudgy," the first documented hybrid Black x Eastern Phoebe, Larimer County, CO, 4/26/2007. Photo by Rachel Hopper; used with permission. Click to enlarge.

In 2007, an odd-looking flycatcher set up a territory above a diversion dam along the Big Thompson River in Loveland, Colorado.  It was clearly a phoebe, but what kind of phoebe, the first few observers couldn’t seem to decide.

Eventually, after puzzling over some internet photos of the smudgy-breasted bird, Nick Komar suggested that it could be a hybrid — one parent a Black Phoebe, the other an Eastern Phoebe.  As soon as Nick’s suggestion landed in my email inbox, I knew I had to get sound recordings.  For one thing, if it was truly a hybrid, then it was well worth documenting, because hybridization had never been reported among phoebes before.  For another thing, I knew that a microphone trained on a hybrid flycatcher would open a unique window directly into the bird’s genetic code.

Why?  Because unlike most other passerines, flycatchers don’t learn their songs.  In a series of classic experiments in the 1980s, Donald Kroodsma raised Willow and Alder Flycatchers and Eastern Phoebes in the laboratory and determined that even if they were raised hearing only the wrong songs, or even if raised in complete silence, the birds all grew up to sing almost exactly like their parents.

This does not happen with most passerine birds.  If you raise a finch or a junco without exposure to finch or junco songs, the bird might learn the wrong song, or it might grow up to sing incoherent babbles, but it definitely won’t sing like “normal” wild members of its species.  Most birds with complex songs need tutoring and time to learn them — but not flycatchers.  Every part of their vocal repertoire is somehow coded in their genes.  Which means that if the genes of two species were to mix, one would expect to hear some sort of hybrid song.

Here’s what a normal Eastern Phoebe sounds like:

Eastern Phoebe song, McCurtain County, OK, 3/22/2008.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

And here’s a normal Black Phoebe:

Black Phoebe song, Humboldt County, CA, 3/27/2009.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Birds with innate songs don’t usually show much geographic variation; they don’t have regional “dialects” the way that, for example, White-crowned Sparrows do.  Therefore, in theory, Eastern Phoebes and Black Phoebes from all across their North American range should produce spectrograms that closely match the ones above.

That’s why, when I saw the spectrograms of the bird from Loveland, I knew we were dealing with a hybrid:

Song of hybrid Black x Eastern Phoebe, Larimer County, CO, 5/2/2007.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

But “Smudgy,” as some of us called him, didn’t just mix up the pieces of Black and Eastern Phoebe songs.  His song behavior was even stranger than one might expect from a hybrid.

For one thing, while Black and Eastern Phoebes both usually sing by alternating two different songtypes, Smudgy had three to choose from — like a Say’s Phoebe, the only species in the genus that had not given him genes.  In addition, the introductory notes in Smudgy’s song were poorly stereotyped — that is, they weren’t always carbon copies of one another, but instead varied slightly with each delivery.  However, the terminal portions of his songs were stereotyped.  Furthermore, the different parts of Smudgy’s songs seemed to show different levels of influence from the parent species.

Why in the world would a hybrid sing like this?  To know for sure, we’ll need more recordings of hybrid phoebes.

Hybrids appear to be on the increase, particularly in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico, where the northeasterly range expansion of Black Phoebe has started bringing it into sympatry with the westward-surging Eastern — but an apparent Black × Say’s showed up in northern California, and it’s worth noting that “Smudgy” was found at least 150 miles outside the range of either of his parent species.  Since hybridity may well scramble the migration genes as well as the song genes, a hybrid phoebe may be possible almost anywhere on the continent.

In Cañon City, Colorado, smack-dab in the center of the contact zone between Black and Eastern Phoebes, SeEtta Moss has begun finding her own hybrid phoebes.  She recently posted photos [1 2] and  a video clip of a definite hybrid, as well as photos of another possible hybrid (perhaps a backcross).  Here’s the spectrogram of the definite hybrid (using the audio from her video clip):

Song of hybrid Black x Eastern Phoebe, Fremont County, CO, 4/9/2010. Audio from video by SeEtta Moss (click for link).

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

As you can see, this bird sings differently than Smudgy, which raises even more questions.  As our sample of hybrid recordings grows, we may be able to discover some really fascinating things — not just about how genes control song, but also about how song evolved in these birds.  More on that coming soon.

6 comments to Song of Smudgy

  • elena klaver

    fascinating!!! thank you so much!!!!!!!!!

  • Dan Lane

    You know, this has “Manuscript Appeal” written all over it, particularly with reference to inherited vocalizations of Tyrannids. I’d encourage you to publish this. It’s particularly handy that Eastern Phoebe was one of the species shown to inherit voice genetically.

  • Nathan Pieplow

    Dan,

    Already published, twice — and there’s probably more to come!

    • Pieplow, N., Leukering, T., and E. Coley. (2008). An Apparent Hybrid Black × Eastern Phoebe (Sayornis nigricans × S. phoebe) from Colorado. Western Birds 39(4): 209-219.

    • McCallum, A., and N. Pieplow. (2010). A Reassessment of Homologies in the Repertoire Organization of Phoebes (Sayornis). Western Birds 41(1): 26-43.

    More on this on the blog soon!

  • Jeff Madison

    Hello Nathan. I have heard a bird call in the mountains west of Denver all my life, and I wonder how to identify the bird. I have never seen the singer. THe song sounds a little like a meadow lark. The call has lots of minor notes, it is about 3 seconds long, with a 10-20 second pause, and then the bird repeats it but with a key change. If you don’t know, where to start? I hear the call used in movies sometimes, too. Thanks

  • Hi all,
    This is a reply to Jeff Madison’s query. Jeff, you’ve provided us with some good clues. May I ask for a couple more? First, does it give exact repeats of the same song several times before changing key? Or is every song different from the one just before it. (See Nathan’s early post on “immediate variety” and “eventual variety.”) Second, what is the habitat in which you hear this singing? Third, what time of day does this bird sing?

    My initial guess, by the way, is Hermit Thrush.
    Sincerely,
    Arch McCallum

  • [...] reasons I explained in my recent post on hybrid flycatchers, vocal differences in flycatchers are likely to represent strong genetic differences.  I noticed [...]